Ghostwriting policies in high-impact biomedical journals: a cross-sectional study.

نویسندگان

  • Xavier Bosch
  • Cristina Hernández
  • Juan M Pericas
  • Pamela Doti
چکیده

A lthough sound authorship of biomedical journal articles relies on personal and professional integrity and accountability, recent controversies concerning ghostwriting and guest authorship have shown that this approach has limitations. Ghostwriting and guest authorship are often linked to academic-industry collaborations. Typically, industrysponsored professional writers prepare complete articles, which are then presented to senior, often expert, academics who submit the article in their own name (perhaps after some editing) and are often reimbursed. Although biomedical journals have led the way in drawing up editorial policies, ghostwriting policies have not been analyzed. We aimed to assess the prevalence and content of ghostwriting policies in the most influential biomedical journals.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Challenging Medical Ghostwriting in US Courts

Complaints about the ethics of medical ghostwriting have increased in the last decade, but little has changed [1–14]. Corruption of the scientific literature through ghostwriting persists in medicine due to the enormous profits for all stakeholders [15], including the pharmaceutical industry that creates the publication strategy, academic researchers acting as key opinion leaders (KOLs) for ind...

متن کامل

Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals

BACKGROUND It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of misconduct. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of misconduct policies of 399 high-impact biomedical journals in ...

متن کامل

Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is used by biomedical journals to guarantee credibility and transparency of the scientific process. Conflict of interest disclosure, however, is not systematically nor consistently dealt with by journals. Recent joint editorial efforts paved the way towards the implementation of uniform vehicles for conflicts of interest disclosure. This paper provi...

متن کامل

Disclosure of financial competing interests in randomised controlled trials: cross sectional review.

Financial relationships among industry, investigators, and academic institutions are growing increasingly complex, raising concerns about sponsors’ considerable and perhaps inappropriate involvement in the conduct and reporting of biomedical research. 2 Medical journals use disclosure as a primary mechanism for managing these conflicts, and many have adopted the 1997 uniform requirements for ma...

متن کامل

Biomedical Research and Corporate Interests: A Question of Academic Freedom

The current situation in medicine has been described as a crisis of credibility, as the profit motive of industry has taken control of clinical trials and the dissemination of data. Pharmaceutical companies maintain a stranglehold over the content of medical journals in three ways: (1) by ghostwriting articles that bias the results of clinical trials, (2) by the sheer economic power they exert ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • JAMA internal medicine

دوره 173 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013